Policy Overview

New Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy has ordered that the existing Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards be rescinded or revoked, in an order issued January 29th, 2025.

Previously, in July 2024, the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards for new vehicles MY 2027-2031. The rules were ultimately published with a significant reduction in stringency for light trucks, the vehicle class with the greatest emissions. NHTSA’s final rule only requires a 2% increase for light-trucks each year, while the preferred proposal required the fuel economy of new light trucks to improve by 4% each year through model years 2027-2031. Light duty trucks are the largest source of emissions in the road transport sector in the United States, and were responsible for almost 80% more CO2 emissions than passenger cars in 2022.

Many major auto manufacturers endorsed the position of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI), which argued the targets for light-duty trucks were overly ambitious. In the AAI’s October 2023 regulatory comments to the EPA, the association specifically cited projections in which one in two (50%) light trucks would not comply with the regulation in 2027-2032. After the release of the weakened rule, AAI CEO John Bozzella stated support for the final outcome of the rule.

CAFE standards regulate how far new vehicles must be able to travel on a gallon of fuel. While other similar standards were created to reduce pollutants from motor vehicles, CAFE standards were originally created with the primary goal of reducing US oil consumption in the US.

Policy Status

NHTSA issued final Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for MY 2027-2031 in June 2024, with significant reductions in ambition. On January 29th, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation ordered that the rules be rescinded or replaced, and penalties for noncompliance were waived by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed in July 2025.

Policy Status

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed July 2025, eliminated compliance penalties and fines for CAFE standards. Although the rule is still in place, there are no consequences for failure to comply.

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Policy Engagement Overview

The current state of corporate engagement on this regulation is summarized below. The "Evidence Profile" at right indicates InfluenceMap's capture of corporate positions on the regulation, ranging from strong opposition to strong support. Both this page and the graph were last updated May 12th, 2025.

Recent Advocacy

  • The automobile industry has largely supported the Transportation Freedom Act, which would repeal the existing corporate average fuel economy standards finalized during the Biden administration. General Motors, Stellantis, and Toyota Motor all supported the Transportation Freedom Act in March 2025 statements issued in a press release on US Senator Moreno’s website. The CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, John Bozzella, also supported the bill in statements on the same press release.

  • The petrochemical industry continues to oppose the regulations. The American Petroleum Institute filed a lawsuit challenging the regulation in June 2024, and the CEO of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers Association opposed the rule in a June 2024 statement.

  • The CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation opposed the rules shortly after finalization in June 2024 statements, requesting significant reductions in stringency.

October 2023 Regulatory Comments

  • Tesla, the BICEP Coalition, and the Zero Emission Transportation Association strongly supported stringent CAFE standards. Tesla advocated for NHTSA to adopt the most stringent possible alternative (PC6LT8), and backed NHTSA’s methodology in setting a baseline for the standards. The Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA) and the Ceres BICEP Coalition, a group of over 75 major companies such as IKEA, Siemens, Trane, and Honeywell, also supported the most stringent proposed alternative (PC6LT8). The BICEP coalition further advocated to “exclude loopholes that encourage larger vehicles or provisions such as off-cycle credits that fail to provide real world improvements.”

  • The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an automaker industry group, opposed the proposed standards. The Alliance stated the standards “exceed technological feasibility and economic practicability” - advocating for significantly weaker standards and to maintain air conditioning and off-cycle credit programs that would reduce the program's stringency.

  • Legacy automakers opposed the proposed CAFE standards and aligned with the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, of which they are members. BMW, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover (Tata Motors), Mitsubishi, Nissan, Stellantis, Subaru, Toyota, and Volkswagen alongside its subsidiary Porsche, all advocated to significantly reduce the stringency of the proposed CAFE standards, and explicitly supported the comments of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. Honda, Hyundai, Mitsubishi, Nissan, and Toyota also opposed using the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) program to establish the program’s baseline, and excluding Honda, advocated maintaining A/C and off-cycle credit programs that reduce the program’s stringency.

  • US automakers Ford and GM also pushed to weaken the proposed CAFE standards, although they did not explicitly endorse the Alliance for Automotive Innovation’s comments. Ford opposed both the proposed standards and the updated Petroleum-Equivalent Fuel Economy (PEF) calculation. Ford also advocated reducing the light truck stringency to a 2% year-over-year increase and limiting the Heavy Duty Pick-Up Truck and Van (HDPUV) standards to MY2030-2032 rather than through to MY2035. General Motors (GM) advocated for weaker CAFE standards in line with a lower 50% 2030 EV share and stated it would not support the proposed light-duty standards unless the updated Petroleum-Equivalent Fuel Economy (PEF) calculation was revised or delayed. GM further noted that only the proposed 2030-32 HDPUV standards are achievable, while calling for NHTSA to “re-evaluate” the MY2033 standards at a later date, and advocated to transfer credits from HDPUVs to light trucks, which would likely further reduce the policy’s stringency.

  • The oil, gas, and ethanol industry opposed the standards, questioning their legality. Valero, the American Petroleum Institute (API), and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) all opposed the standards and argued the standards were unlawful. AFPM called the standards a “de facto EV mandate”, while API argued NHTSA cannot “effectively require electrification of a portion of the light-duty vehicle and heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans fleets.” Valero claimed that NHTSA was attempting to “mask what is an otherwise illegal proposal” by considering compliance with other standards in the US to set a baseline.

  • The US Chamber and National Association of Manufacturers pushed to weaken the proposed standards. The US Chamber called the rules “unrealistic”, advocated for a reduction in stringency, and refuted the legality of NHTSA’s calculation of a baseline for the standards while citing the Alliance for Automotive Innovation in its comments. The National Association of Manufacturers also refuted the legality of NHTSA’s baseline and called for the standards to be delayed until the Department of Energy’s proposal on the PEF was finalized.

Policy Status

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed July 2025, eliminated compliance penalties and fines for CAFE standards. Although the rule is still in place, there are no consequences for failure to comply.

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Live Lobbying Alerts

Auto industry supports aggressive regulatory rollbacks in the US

06/03/2025

General Motors, Stellantis, Toyota, and the CEO of Alliance for Automotive Innovation issued statements on 1 March supporting the Transportation Freedom Act. The bill would repeal existing emissions standards for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty transport in the US, and also remove California and other states' authority to enforce zero-emission vehicle sales targets.

Specifically, Title II of the Transportation Freedom Act would repeal existing light- and medium duty GHG emissions standards for passenger cars and trucks MY2027+, phase 3 GHG emissions standards for heavy-duty motor vehicles MY2030+, and corporate average fuel economy standards for passenger cars and light trucks MY2027+ and heavy duty trucks MY2030-2035. New, less stringent GHG emissions standards would be drafted by the current EPA. Title III would remove the waivers granted to California to enforce its own emissions standards and zero-emission vehicle sales targets, and also repeal Section 177 of the Clean Air Act, which enables other US states to follow California's emissions standards. These actions would prevent California and all other participating US states from enforcing the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, Advanced Clean Cars II rule, Advanced Clean Fleet rule, and other California-led policies.

Entities Engaged on Policy

Influencemap Performance BandOrganizationPolicy PositionPolicy Engagement Intensity