Policy Overview

Regulating methane emissions through the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a central component of the Biden Administration’s plans to reduce methane emissions by 30% below 2020 levels by 2030. The initial November 2021 rule proposed to update performance standards and requirements around monitoring and repairing leaks for both new and existing wells. Older wells have previously not been subject to EPA methane standards.

In November 2022, the EPA released a supplemental proposal to its methane regulations. This second part of the rule builds on the initial proposal by specifying rules for methane emission leak detection and repair, including at smaller wells, alongside providing more details on key components such as flaring and technology use.

Policy Outcome

The EPA published its finalized methane rule in December 2023 following comment periods on its initial (Nov 2021) and supplemental (Nov 2022) proposals. Despite heavy negative engagement from the oil and gas industry, the final rule included leak detection and repair measures for small and large leaks, restrictions on routine flaring, and a zero-emitting standard for pneumatic controllers and pumps.

Policy Status

Final rule published in December 2023

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Policy Engagement Overview

The current state of corporate engagement on this regulation is summarized below. The "Evidence Profile" at right indicates InfluenceMap's capture of corporate positions on the regulation, ranging from strong opposition to strong support. Both this page and the graph were last updated March 2023.

Following heavy negative lobbying on the November 2021 EPA methane proposal, the oil and gas industry continued to take positions to oppose and weaken the November 2022 supplementary proposal.

Latest Lobbying Trends:

Long-term Lobbying Trends:

  • Several powerful cross-sector and oil and gas sector specific industry associations lobbied to weaken the initial, January 2022 proposed methane standards, such as the American Petroleum Institute (API), Gas Association (AGA), US Chamber of Commerce (USC), and National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). Among other arguments, the API, USC, and AGA each challenged the EPA’s legal authority under the Clean Air Act to require states to update methane emissions performance standards for existing facilities.

  • Oil and gas companies took differing positions on the proposed regulations. ExxonMobil, Shell, and BP took mixed positions, while Chevron attempted to weaken key components of the regulation by opposing measures around monitoring and repairing methane leaks, emphasizing feasibility and cost effectiveness concerns, and questioning the legal basis for ‘community monitoring.’

  • The largest utilities in the US also engaged with differing positions. Ten utilities submitted a negative joint comment, while four – Consolidated Edison, Exelon, National Grid, and Pacific Gas & Electric – submitted a positive joint comment. National Grid engaged with contradictory positions, joining both the negative and positive joint comments alongside its own positive comment.

  • In general, oil and gas lobbying efforts contradict recent top-line statements from the industry in support of direct federal regulation of methane, including from the AGA and USC, as well as companies Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil among others.

Policy Status

Final rule published in December 2023

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Live Lobbying Alerts

Oil and gas companies issue mixed support for the US EPA 2023 Methane Regulations

20/03/2023

A number of oil and gas companies have provided statements on the US federal government's proposed supplemental regulations for methane emissions from the oil and gas sector. Chevron, BP, Devon Energy, and Occidental Petroleum issued mixed support for the proposals, expressing both positive and negative positions positions on the regulations. Shell, meanwhile, appears to communicate a more broadly supportive position, however, it also avoids commenting on key elements of the regulations.

​​Oil and gas entities oppose US EPA 2023 Methane Regulations

20/03/2023

​​Several oil and gas entities opposed the US federal government’s proposed supplemental regulations for methane emissions from the oil and gas sector. Comments submitted by ExxonMobil and Coterra Energy appear unsupportive of the proposal. Similarly, submissions made by industry associations such as the American Petroleum Institute (API), American Gas Association (AGA), American Exploration & Production Council (AXPC), Texas Oil & Gas Association (TXOGA), and the US Chamber of Commerce have opposed key elements of the proposal.

BP supports US Environmental Protection Agency's 2022 Methane Regulations

25/11/2022

In a 20th November Financial Times article, BP’s head of US business stated support for the US Environmental Protection Agency’s 2022 Methane Regulations, and emphasized the need to stop flaring.

API advocates for removal of oil and gas leasing restrictions

03/11/2022

On July 6th 2022, the Vice President of Upstream Policy at the American Petroleum Institute (API), Kevin O’Scannlain, wrote an op-ed in Real Clear Energy advocating for the removal of restrictions on oil and gas leasing in US federal lands and waters. O’Scannlain also called for a “robust” 5-year leasing program in the Outer Continental Shelf. The article also opposed the US Environmental Protection Agency’s regulation of methane in the Permian Basin, calling it “unproductive” and “burdensome”, and went on to use this argument to support the expansion of Section 45Q tax credits for the development of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS).

Entities Engaged on Policy

The following table lists companies and industry associations that have engaged on the EPA's 2022 methane regulation. Click on an entity name to view the full profile on its climate policy engagement.

Influencemap Performance BandOrganizationPolicy PositionPolicy Engagement Intensity